ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
A data-driven method for surgeon-specific difficulty assessment in third molar extraction.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CBCT-Based Clinico-Radiomic Nomogram Predicting Preoperative Mandibular Third Molar Difficulty: Development/Validation.International dental journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: The purpose of this study is to use a data-driven method to analyze the time taken by junior doctors to extract lower wisdom teeth and the factors affecting the difficulty of the procedure. It aims to reveal the distribution characteristics of difficulty factors at different stages of development, establish a mathematical model for procedural difficulty, evaluate the effectiveness of the existing difficulty scale, and provide difficulty indicators for the extraction training of impacted teeth for young doctors at different stages. Materials and methods: We collected surgical records of 419 cases of lower impacted wisdom teeth extraction completed by 9 residents. The difficulty index was based on a scale with 14 primary indicators and 37 secondary indicators. We proposed a data-driven method for surgeon-specific difficulty assessment (DDSS) of third molar extraction surgery. When assessing the surgical difficulty for a surgeon, the DDSS uses a method based on Lasso regression to classify the doctor as either a junior doctor who has completed grade 1 training or a novice doctor. It then calls upon the corresponding pre-trained model to conduct targeted difficulty prediction and provide key difficulty factors. Results: Our method achieved an accuracy of 80% and an AUC of 0.85 with SVM. The methods we proposed outperformed the methods without decoupling. The clustering analysis revealed that inexperienced surgeons are affected by a larger number of factors, while experienced surgeons are primarily influenced by four key factors: Crown resistance, impacted type, mouth opening, and gender. Learning curves indicated that surgeons typically become proficient after 8 months of practice. Conclusion: We propose a data-driven decoupling-prediction model, which improves the model's performance in the task of assessing dental surgery difficulty. We also draw the learning curve of novice surgeons based on the data decoupling method we proposed. This provides a new perspective for surgical difficulty assessment and surgeon training, and offers a reliable conclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.