ArticleGastroenterology report2025
Clinical and molecular implications of sex differences in surgically treated early-onset gastric cancer.
Article in Gastroenterology report, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Age-related prognostic trends in surgically resected female lymph node-metastatic gastric cancer: insights from SEER.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer predominantly occurs in middle-aged and elderly individuals, whereas cases arising in individuals before the age of 45 years are defined as early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC). The biological and clinical characteristics of EOGC remain insufficiently understood. This study aimed to investigate the sex-specific clinicopathological and molecular features of EOGC. Methods: We retrospectively analysed a large cohort of 4,903 gastric cancer patients, including 410 EOGC patients, to compare survival outcomes and clinicopathological features between EOGC patients and late-onset gastric cancer (LOGC) patients and between male and female EOGC patients. Additionally, transcriptome and genome sequencing data from a public Korean EOGC cohort were analysed to identify sex-specific molecular alterations, which were further validated in a Chinese EOGC cohort by using immunohistochemistry. Results: Overall survival was significantly shorter in the LOGC group than in the EOGC group. In contrast, EOGC patients were characterized by a greater proportion of females, later T and N stages, more tumours located in the middle third of the stomach, a higher prevalence of diffuse and signet ring cell types, poorer differentiation, smaller tumour size, and lower HER2- and Ki67-positive rates. Among patients with EOGC, females accounted for the majority but had worse outcomes; these female EOGC patients were diagnosed earlier, presented with high proportions of lymph node metastasis and advanced stage, and a higher incidence of differentiated diffuse-type tumours than male EOGC patients. Molecular analyses further revealed female-specific Conclusion: EOGC displays pronounced sex-specific clinicopathological and molecular features. These findings highlight the need for sex-based considerations in understanding EOGC biology and tailoring clinical management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.