ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Effect of a Third COVID-19 Vaccine Dose on the Incidence of Long COVID Among Adults Who Completed a Primary Vaccine Series: a Target Trial Emulation in a Community-Based Cohort.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Evidence on whether a third COVID-19 vaccine dose lowers long COVID risk is mixed. We estimated the effect of receiving ≥1 third dose versus completing only a primary series on 6- and 12-month long COVID incidence using a target-trial emulation in a U.S. community cohort. Methods: We analyzed the CHASING COVID Cohort, a prospective, community-based study of U.S. adults. Eligible participants were ≥18 years, had completed a two-dose primary series, had no prior long COVID, and had no SARS-CoV-2 infection in the 3 months before time zero. Strategies compared were: receive a third dose at time zero vs. not receive a third dose during follow-up. Long COVID was defined as ≥1 new symptom at or beyond 3 months post-infection with concurrent activity limitation, both absent in the prior year. Follow-up was 6 and 12 months. We used a per-protocol analog: participants were artificially censored upon deviating from their assigned strategy or lost-to-follow-up, with inverse-probability weights to address selection due to censoring and time-varying confounding. We fit weighted pooled logistic models to estimate weighted incidence, differences, and ratios at each horizon. Results: Across 16 sequential trials (18,930 person-trials; 4,044 unique individuals), 3,321 person-trials received a third dose at time zero and 15,609 did not. At 6 months, weighted long COVID incidence was 0.9% (95% CI, 0.5%, 1.3%) with a third dose vs. 1.0% (0.8%, 1.1%) without (risk difference (RD), -0.1%; 95% CI, -0.5%, 0.4%; risk ratio (RR), 0.93; 95% CI, 0.54, 1.44). At 12 months, incidence was 4.9% (4.1%, 5.9%) with a third dose vs. 4.5% (4.1%, 4.8%) without (RD, 0.4%; 95% CI, -0.5%, 1.4%; RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.90, 1.33). Conclusion: In this community-based target-trial emulation, receiving a third COVID-19 vaccine dose did not meaningfully reduce 6- or 12-month long COVID incidence compared with completing only a primary series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.