ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Childhood living conditions as predictors of self-rated health status in middle-aged and older adults: Evidence from a machine learning analysis in 27 high-income countries.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Health inequalities in high-income countries may have roots in childhood. We aimed to develop machine learning (ML) algorithms to assess the impact of childhood living conditions on self-rated health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We analyzed data from 45,570 individuals aged 50+ across 26 European countries and Israel. Information on 39 childhood living conditions and self-rated health was collected. Seven ML algorithms were used to predict health outcomes. Results: All algorithms performed well, with AUC scores ranging from 0.699 to 0.774 and accuracy between 0.621 and 0.724, with CatBoost as the best performer. Self-rated health before age 15 was the most critical predictor. Other key predictors varied by domain such as religion importance, exposure to World War II, physical harm from others and the relationship with the father. We revealed heterogeneity across genders, regions of Europe and levels of COVID-19 lockdown stringency. For instance, mother education was a more prominent predictor of late-life health for females than for males. Conclusion: This study is one of the first to predict health based on childhood conditions and ML. Our results demonstrate the usefulness of ML in identifying early-life conditions that influence health and provide insights for addressing health inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.