Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41282829›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Dietary exposures and risk of anxiety and depression symptoms in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936: a cohort-level GLAD Project analysis.

Janie Corley, Paul Redmond, Melissa M Lane, Felice N Jacka, Deborah N Ashtree, Simon R Cox

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janie CorleyLothian Birth Cohorts, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7551-1871
Paul RedmondLothian Birth Cohorts, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Melissa M LaneIMPACT (the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation), Food & Mood Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Felice N JackaIMPACT (the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation), Food & Mood Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Deborah N AshtreeIMPACT (the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation), Food & Mood Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Simon R CoxLothian Birth Cohorts, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

Funding

Longitudinal multi-omic biomarkers for neurocognitive decline prior to dementia onsetU01AG083829 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH · PI Sarah Elizabeth Harris · 2024 to 2026
$3.5M
Evaluating Longitudinal Changes in the Human Structural Connectome in Relation to Cognitive AgingR01AG054628 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI TUCKER-DROB, ELLIOT MAX · 2017 to 2021
$2.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054628NIA NIH HHS U01 AG083829Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mental disorders such as anxiety and depression are leading contributors to disability worldwide, with growing concern in older adults-particularly in Scotland-where poor diet and mental health challenges are common. While the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study has identified dietary risk factors for physical health, their associations with mental health in later life remain underexplored. Methods: We used data from 880 participants (mean age 70y) of the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 in Scotland to examine cross-sectional associations between 11 GBD-defined dietary exposures (fruit, vegetables, legumes, wholegrains, milk, fibre, calcium, polyunsaturated fatty acids, red meat, processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages) and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Analyses followed harmonised protocols from the Global burden of disease Lifestyle And mental Disorders (GLAD) project (DERR2-10.2196/65576). Dietary exposures were standardised (g/day or % kcal/day), and mental health symptoms dichotomised using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS ≥8 vs <8). Logistic regression models estimated odds ratios per one standard deviation increase, unadjusted and adjusted for age, sex, and education. Sensitivity analyses used energy-adjusted dietary intakes. Results: Higher milk and calcium intakes were associated with greater odds of anxiety (milk adjusted OR = 1.194, 95% CI 1.018-1.400; calcium adjusted OR = 1.210, 95% CI 1.027-1.426), and higher sugar-sweetened beverage intake with greater odds of depression (adjusted OR = 1.243, 95% CI 1.007-1.535). After energy-adjustment, higher milk intake remained associated with anxiety (adjusted OR = 1.196, 95% CI = 1.020-1.403), higher fruit intake was associated with lower odds of anxiety (adjusted OR = 0.792, 95% CI 0.640-0.981), and sugar-sweetened beverages remained associated with depression (adjusted OR = 1.249, 95% CI 1.013-1.541). No other associations were significant. Conclusions: In older Scottish adults, we observed only modest evidence that certain GBD-defined dietary exposures are associated with anxiety and depression symptoms.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionDietGlobal Burden of DiseaseLothian Birth Cohort 1936Older adultsScotland

Identifiers

PMID41282829
PMCPMC12632685

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.