ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
The Role Of Drug Indication On Incidence Rate Heterogeneity: A Large-Scale, Systematic Evaluation Across An International Network Of Observational Databases.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Incidence rate estimates are sensitive to a range of factors, including age, sex, and geographical setting (data source). The magnitude of the impact of drug indication on incidence rates remains underexplored. Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study using 13 healthcare databases to estimate the incidence rates of 73 health outcomes across 8 drug classes with multiple indications. We calculated incidence rates for each drug-outcome pair and performed random-effects meta-analyses to pool results across databases. Then, we conducted variance components analysis to find the proportions of variability attributed to database, age, sex, and indication. We reported the median of the variance components across all 73 health outcomes as a measure of the magnitude of differences across indications, age, sex, and database, per drug class. Results: Adjusting for database, age, and sex differences, the drug classes with the highest median VC were trimethoprim (0.49), SGLT-2 inhibitors (0.26), and beta blockers (0.10), while the drug class with the lowest VC was GLP-1 agonists (<0.01). Within each drug class, and adjusting for all other factors, age was frequently the strongest contributor to incidence variation (for 5/8 drug classes, the highest class-wide median VC was the age median VC), followed by database, indication, then biological sex. Conclusion: This study showed that for some drug classes, there exists substantial variation in incidence rates estimates across indications even after accounting for heterogeneity due to age, biological sex, and data source. As many drugs have multiple indications in clinical practice, it may be important to consider drug indication when estimating incidence rates in observational studies for the purpose of patient safety evaluations.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.