Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41283261›Full record

ArticleMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Data Augmentation and Synthetic Data Generation in Rare Disease Research: A Scoping Review.

Rebecca Finetti, Bianca Roncaglia, Anna Visibelli, Ottavia Spiga, Annalisa Santucci

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca FinettiDepartment of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-6969-1493
Bianca RoncagliaDepartment of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-0009-4011
Anna VisibelliDepartment of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9281-034X
Ottavia SpigaDepartment of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0263-7107
Annalisa SantucciDepartment of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6976-9086

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRare diseases represent a significant research challenge due to the limited availability of data, small patient cohorts, and heterogeneous phenotypes. Data augmentation and synthetic data generation are increasingly adopted to mitigate these limitations.

methodsThis scoping review maps the application of data augmentation and synthetic data generation methods as strategies to address these limitations. A total of 118 studies published between 2018 and 2025 were identified through PubMed, Scopus, and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore.

resultsImaging data headed the field, followed by clinical and omics datasets. Classical augmentation, mainly geometric and photometric transformations, emerged as the most frequent approach, while deep generative models have rapidly expanded since 2021. Rule- and model-based methods were less common but demonstrated high interpretability in small datasets.

conclusionsOverall, these techniques enabled dataset expansion and improved model robustness. However, both approaches require rigorous validation to confirm biological plausibility. Together, these methods can transform data scarcity from a barrier into a driver of methodological innovation, enabling more inclusive rare disease research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchRare DiseasesHumansdata augmentationmachine learningrare diseasessynthetic data

Identifiers

PMID41283261
PMCPMC12641889

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.