ArticleMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Data Augmentation and Synthetic Data Generation in Rare Disease Research: A Scoping Review.
Article in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward Precision Oral Medicine in Pemphigus Vulgaris: A Conceptual AI Framework for Rituximab Response Prediction.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Dual-Branch Frequency-Aware Attention Framework for Rare Neurological Disease Classification from Brain MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Who's afraid of synthetic data? Hybrid approaches to deliver medical digital twins.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRare diseases represent a significant research challenge due to the limited availability of data, small patient cohorts, and heterogeneous phenotypes. Data augmentation and synthetic data generation are increasingly adopted to mitigate these limitations.
methodsThis scoping review maps the application of data augmentation and synthetic data generation methods as strategies to address these limitations. A total of 118 studies published between 2018 and 2025 were identified through PubMed, Scopus, and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore.
resultsImaging data headed the field, followed by clinical and omics datasets. Classical augmentation, mainly geometric and photometric transformations, emerged as the most frequent approach, while deep generative models have rapidly expanded since 2021. Rule- and model-based methods were less common but demonstrated high interpretability in small datasets.
conclusionsOverall, these techniques enabled dataset expansion and improved model robustness. However, both approaches require rigorous validation to confirm biological plausibility. Together, these methods can transform data scarcity from a barrier into a driver of methodological innovation, enabling more inclusive rare disease research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.