Trial reportMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Telerehabilitation and Face-to-Face Exergame Delivery Modalities to Improve Postural Control in Older Adults: A Randomised Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Telerehabilitation and Face-to-Face Exergame Delivery Modalities to Improve Postural Control in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA systematic exercise programme using low-cost virtual reality devices can help maintain and improve postural control in older adults. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two different exergame programme modalities: telerehabilitation (TR) and face-to-face (FF).
methodsA randomised controlled trial was conducted with 16 participants aged 65 to 75. Both groups completed an 18-session exergame intervention over six weeks, with the TR group (exposure) receiving remote sessions and the FF group having in-person (control) sessions with a physiotherapist. Assessments were carried out at baseline, at weeks 2, 4, and 6, with two follow-ups at weeks 8 and 10. Centre of Pressure (CoP) measures in tasks: eyes open (EO), eyes closed (EC), medial-lateral (ML) weight-shifting exergame and anterior-posterior (AP) weight-shifting exergame, and clinical tests were used to evaluate postural control.
resultsTR and FF significantly reduced the CoP
conclusionBoth six-week exergame programmes were equally effective at improving postural control. Given the observed specific effects of TR and FF delivery, physiotherapists can consider either modality to suit individual needs and access, or as a complementary approach to maintain and improve postural control in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.