ReviewInternational journal of neonatal screening2025
Newborn Screening for Metachromatic Leukodystrophy: A Systematic Literature Review.
Review in International journal of neonatal screening, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical management of metachromatic leukodystrophy cases identified in the German and Austrian Newborn screening pilots.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate the emerging evidence on newborn screening (NBS) for metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD; MIM #250100). The review focuses on (1) screening assay performance, (2) diagnostic confirmation methods and care pathways, (3) feasibility of population-based identification, and (4) the impact of early diagnosis and treatment on health outcomes. Electronic databases were searched in February 2025, and supplementary searches were performed up to 17 June 2025, for articles referencing NBS for MLD and treatments for MLD; 52 publications were eligible for inclusion. Nationwide NBS for MLD is currently carried out in Norway and large prospective pilots are running in Germany, Austria, Italy and the US. MLD meets established Wilson and Jungner criteria, with a reliable screening algorithm, established confirmatory diagnostics, and actionable care pathways. There is ongoing work to develop tools to predict disease severity and subtype. Early intervention-via gene therapy for early-onset MLD and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for late-onset forms-significantly improves outcomes when initiated before symptom onset. This review provides the first comprehensive synthesis of the evidence supporting MLD for inclusion in NBS programs, underscoring the public health value of early identification and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.