Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284006›Full record

ReviewArchives of microbiology2025

Postbiotics in the food industry: applications, delivery systems, and future perspectives.

Elif Gülşen Karabacak Aydin, Sarhan Mohammed, Ahmet Hilmi Con

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elif Gülşen Karabacak AydinDepartment of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis University, Atakum, Samsun, 55139, Turkey. elif.karabacak@omu.edu.tr.
Sarhan MohammedDepartment of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis University, Atakum, Samsun, 55139, Turkey.
Ahmet Hilmi ConDepartment of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ondokuz Mayis University, Atakum, Samsun, 55139, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postbiotics, defined as microbial metabolites, confer health and nutritional benefits. Postbiotics, which are a step beyond probiotics, have emerged as a promising alternative to live microbial cells. While offering stability and safety, postbiotics improve efficacy and avoid the risks associated with live microorganisms. Key metabolite substances such as bacteriocin, peptides, and exopolysaccharides exhibit biological activities, thereby improving food preservation and functional enhancement. This comprehensive review aims to provide know-how for postbiotics' technological, functional, and health-promoting applications across various food systems. Advanced transport mechanisms for delivering postbiotics, such as encapsulation, nanoemulsions, and microfluidic microspheres, have created effective postbiotic delivery systems (PDS). Despite significant progress, mechanistic understanding, production standardization, and regulatory frameworks are still not well understood. Therefore, in-depth research into transport mechanisms and global compliance standards will ensure safe and reproducible applications of postbiotics. Future innovations that integrate agro-industrial by-product bioconversion, advances in omics technologies, and AI-assisted modeling will further support the circular bioeconomy, optimization, and functional prediction from a sustainability perspective.

Indexed as

Food IndustryFood MicrobiologyFood PreservationHumansProbioticsDelivery systemsEncapsulationFood safetyFunctional foodsNanotechnologyPostbioticsSustainability

Identifiers

PMID41284006

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.