SynthesisEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
Screw fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for undisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionScrew fixation and hemiarthroplasty are commonly used surgical options for treating undisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. While fixation preserves the native joint, arthroplasty offers immediate mechanical stability. The optimal treatment remains controversial.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar through June 2025. Twelve studies (including randomised controlled trials and observational cohorts) encompassing 2190 patients treated with screw fixation and 2606 with hemiarthroplasty were included. Outcomes assessed included intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rates, operation time, hospital stay, pain scores, Harris Hip Score, complication and reoperation rates, and mortality at 1 month and 1 year.
resultsScrew fixation was associated with significantly less intraoperative blood loss (MD = - 162.79 mL), shorter surgery time (MD = - 31.68 min), and reduced transfusion requirements (RR = 0.30). Hospital stay was shorter by 3.5 days on average. Pain scores at final follow-up were similar between groups (p = 0.55), while Harris Hip Scores were slightly higher with fixation (MD = 2.09), though of questionable clinical relevance. However, fixation carried a markedly higher risk of reoperation (RR = 3.54) and complications such as non-union and osteonecrosis. Mortality at 1 month and 1 year trended lower in the fixation group but did not reach statistical significance.
conclusionsScrew fixation provides notable perioperative advantages and comparable long-term functional outcomes in select elderly patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures. However, it is offset by a significantly higher risk of failure and reoperation. Hemiarthroplasty, while more invasive, ensures greater mechanical reliability and lower revision rates. Treatment decisions should be individualized based on patient frailty, fracture characteristics, and mobility goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41284064What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.