Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41284991›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Platelet Indices as Unequivocal Markers of Active Disease in Patients With Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study.

Abhijeet Kumar Agrawal, Sourya Acharya, Jahnabi Bhagawati, Shivali Kashikar, Nishant Raj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abhijeet Kumar Agrawal *Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4938-4776
Sourya Acharya *Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1969-0817
Jahnabi Bhagawati *Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0286-1093
Shivali KashikarDatta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6818-4593
Nishant RajDatta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0117-2694

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpondyloarthritis is divided into axial and peripheral subtypes. The axial subtype is further divided into ankylosing spondylitis (AS) or radiographic axial spondyloarthritis and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA). Although AS and nr-axSpA share some common features, nr-axSpA lacks X-ray-based sacroiliitis as defined by the modified New York criteria, that is, the presence of either bilateral grade 2 sacroiliitis or unilateral grade 3 sacroiliitis, which is present in AS. Disease activity in either of them is measured via C-reactive protein (CRP) levels or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis showing sacroiliitis due to the presence of bone marrow edema. A person with active disease can have normal CRP and MRI findings, especially in nr-axSpA. Immune system activation during inflammation has been shown to alter platelet maturation and morphology, as reflected by platelet indices. These platelet indices have been studied in the past in various autoimmune diseases, such as psoriatic arthritis, AS, and rheumatoid arthritis, and have been correlated with disease activity. Particularly, in spondyloarthritis, platelet indices are more central to the pathology of sacroiliitis, and CRP, which is currently used, is a generalized marker of inflammation. Therefore, platelet indices can provide a better understanding of inflammation, particularly in patients with sacroiliitis.

objectiveThis study aims to investigate whether platelet indices can be better markers of inflammation in patients with nr-axSpA. We will determine whether platelet indices are reliable biomarkers for measuring disease activity in patients with nr-axSpA.

methodsAll patients who are classified as having axial spondyloarthritis as per the Assessment of Spondylarthritis International Society criteria will be included in this study. Patients will be divided into 2 case groups: group A (patients without radiographic sacroiliitis [nr-axSpA]) and group B (patients with radiographic sacroiliitis [AS]). Healthy individuals will be enrolled as controls to compare and correlate platelet indices such as platelet count, plateletcrit, mean platelet volume, and platelet distribution width with CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and MRI findings in patients with AS and nr-axSpA.

resultsThis is a nonfunded study. The data collection started on February 1, 2025, and we expect to complete the study by December 2027. As of July 2025, 7 individuals had been enrolled in groups A and B, respectively, and 5 individuals had been included in the control group. At the end of the study, we will be able to correlate whether platelet indices are trustworthy biomarkers of active disease in patients with nr-axSpA.

conclusionsIf platelet indices prove to be better markers of active disease in patients with nr-AxSpA, then these markers should be included in the routine evaluation of these patients. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/71909.

Indexed as

Axial SpondyloarthritisBlood PlateletsAdultBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMean Platelet VolumeSacroiliitisSpondylitis, AnkylosingBiomarkersC-Reactive Proteinankylosing spondylitisC-reactive proteinCRP-negative spondyloarthritisnonradiographic axial spondyloarthritisplatelet indicessacroiliitis

Identifiers

PMID41284991
PMCPMC12686854

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.