Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41285594›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2025

To Ground Research in the Lived Experience of Patients and Caregivers, Give Us a Voice!

Jeffrey Lubell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jeffrey Lubell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

My daughter has been diagnosed with a range of chronic conditions, including Hyper-mobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). I have approached my role as caregiver in the same way I approach my day job leading social science research: reading the literature, carefully observing her condition, and developing hypotheses about her conditions and how they might be treated. I now have more than 7 years of longitudinal observation-a wealth of data-but no easy way to share with the medical research community the hypotheses these observations have engendered and my ideas about how to productively structure future research to accelerate progress toward treatments for her and others like her. In this essay, I share my thoughts on why patient and caregiver observations and hypotheses are important and how the medical research field might tap into them to make faster progress toward effective treatments for complex medical conditions.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCaregiversFatigue Syndrome, ChronicFemaleHumanschronic illnessEhlers-Danlos Syndromelong COVIDlongitudinal researchmyalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)patient and public involvement in research

Identifiers

PMID41285594
PMCPMC12751309

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.