ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of in vitro liver models and non-human primates for predicting ADAR RNA editing efficiency in human liver.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver-originated diseases remain a significant global health burden, with limited treatment options available. RNA therapeutics, particularly adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR)-mediated editing using editing oligonucleotides (EONs) offer a novel approach to address these unmet medical needs. This study evaluates in vitro and in vivo liver models to predict the therapeutic potential of chemically modified EONs in human liver tissue, using ACTB as target. Multiple liver models, including primary human hepatocytes (PHH), cancer-derived cell lines, and iPSC-derived hepatocytes in both 2D and 3D formats, were characterized for ADAR expression, liver functionality, and RNA editing efficiency. The results show consistent ADAR expression across most models, with 3D models, particularly PHH spheroids and liver microtissues, closely mimicking human liver tissue in gene expression and editing capacity. In vivo, non-human primate liver biopsies showed high levels of ACTB editing, consistent with findings from PHH models. These findings highlight the critical role of preclinical models in EON selection, where multiple factors must be carefully considered. A multimodel assessment utilizing composite scoring to comprehensively assess the key parameters seems to be the approach of choice to maximize translatability across preclinical models and increase the likelihood of success in clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.