Evidence mapPaperPMID 41285994Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Evaluation of clinical pharmacy services in patients receiving antithrombotic treatment in a randomized controlled trial.

Damla Sosyal, Muhammed Yunus Bektay, Nusret Acikgoz, Fikret Vehbi Izzettin

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Anticoagulation Stewardship Program in the DOAC Era.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Pharmacist-Led Discharge Counseling and Adherence to Postpartum Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: A Pre-Post Observational Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Damla SosyalDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Muhammed Yunus BektayDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Pharmacy, Istanbul, Turkey. yunusbektay@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2032-9957
Nusret AcikgozDepartment of Cardiology, Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Fikret Vehbi IzzettinDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Pharmacy, Istanbul, Turkey. fvizzettin@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5568-7012

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients receiving antithrombotic therapy are at increased risk of drug-related problems (DRPs) due to the complexity of their regimens and high-risk pharmacological profiles. Clinical pharmacists, through structured medication reviews and active collaboration with the healthcare team, have been shown to optimise pharmacotherapy, reduce medication errors, and improve patient safety outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacy services on the identification and prevention of DRPs in hospitalised cardiology patients receiving antithrombotic drugs. A prospective, randomised controlled trial was conducted between November 2021 and November 2022 in the cardiology ward of a tertiary-care university hospital in Istanbul, Türkiye. Four hundred adult patients prescribed at least one antithrombotic agent (ATC group B01) were randomly assigned (1:1) to a control group, in which patients were monitored without intervention, or an intervention group, in which a clinical pharmacist performed a structured medication review using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) classification v9.1. Recommendations for resolving clinically significant DRPs were directly communicated to the physician in charge during multidisciplinary ward rounds. Patients were followed for unplanned readmissions at 1- and 3-months post-discharge. In the control group, the mean age was 67.2 ± 12.2 years, while in the intervention group it was 67.8 ± 12.3 years. Coronary artery disease and hypertension were the most prevalent comorbidities in both groups. A total of 561 DRPs were identified in the control group and 497 in the intervention group, with treatment safety and treatment effectiveness being the most common problem categories. Drug selection and dose selection were the leading causes of DRPs. In the intervention group, 248 recommendations for 266 clinically significant DRPs were made for 126 patients (63% of the group), of which 94.76% were accepted by physicians. The most frequent drug-level interventions were dose adjustments (29.65%) and initiation of new therapy (28.49%). The mean number of clinically significant DRPs per patient was significantly lower in the intervention group compared with the control group (p < 0.05). Active involvement of a clinical pharmacist within a multidisciplinary hospital team significantly reduced clinically significant DRPs in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy. These findings underscore the value of integrating clinical pharmacists into inpatient care to optimise pharmacotherapy and improve medication safety outcomes.

Indexed as

Fibrinolytic AgentsPharmacy Service, HospitalAgedDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharmacistsProspective StudiesTurkeyFibrinolytic AgentsAntithrombinsClinical pharmacyDrug-related problem cardiologyPCNEPharmaceutical care servicesPharmacists

Identifiers

PMID41285994
PMCPMC12644636

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.