Trial reportScientific reports2025
Incidence of postoperative pharyngeal complications after using a new laryngeal mask airway supreme insertion method.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, a new insertion method was used to reduce the intracuff pressure of laryngeal mask airway (LMA), and its impact on pharyngeal complications was compared with that of patients under routine care. Sixty women who underwent general anesthesia with LMA for hysteroscopic surgery were randomly allocated into routine care and intervention groups. In the routine care group, the LMA was inserted according to the LMA practice manual. In the intervention group, after insertion with standard manoeuvre, the LMA was withdrawn several millimeters to reduce hypopharynx compression, and the intracuff pressure was then fine-tuned to the minimum effective pressure through volume titration. Pharyngeal complications were assessed at 1, 2, 6 and 24 h postoperatively. Composite pharyngeal complications, pharyngeal complications at different time points and LMA intracuff pressures were compared. The study ultimately included 57 patients. The incidence of composite pharyngeal complications in 24 h was lower in the intervention group than in the routine care group (10.3% vs. 32.1%, P = 0.044). The differences in the incidence of pharyngeal complications at different time points between and within groups were marginally significant (P = 0.052 and 0.060, respectively). Mean LMA intracuff pressure was lower in the intervention group versus the routine care group (11.28 ± 4.22 vs. 68.89 ± 22.53 cmH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.