ArticleScientific reports2025
Personalized fitness recommendations using machine learning for optimized national health strategy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: Focus on Hypertension.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Pooled it
- Heterogeneity among exercise participants: latent profile analysis and differential persistence pathways based on the pressure-support-motivation (PSM) framework.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rising concerns over public health and chronic disease prevalence have intensified the demand for data-driven, personalized fitness interventions. While national health programs offer general guidelines, they often lack the granularity required to address individual variability in health status, lifestyle, and demographic context. This paper presents a machine learning framework to generate personalized fitness recommendations aligned with national health goals. Leveraging population-scale data, the aim is to optimize physical activity planning while maintaining fairness and clinical relevance across demographic subgroups. The study utilizes the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset, integrating biometric, behavioral, and demographic features. To enhance the behavioral relevance of our predictions, we integrated supplemental variables from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), capturing psychological, motivational, and environmental factors that influence physical activity adherence. After preprocessing, models were developed using XGBoost, Decision Trees, and Artificial Neural Networks. Both regression (to estimate weekly activity minutes) and classification (to assign risk groups) tasks were addressed. Performance was evaluated through MeanIoU, Dice Score, sensitivity, and specificity. Demographic fairness was assessed via subgroup residuals and fairness gap analysis. XGBoost achieved superior performance, with a MeanIoU of 0.789 and F1 scores exceeding 0.79 across all risk categories. Model consistency was observed across age, gender, and ethnicity, with fairness gaps below 0.05. Residual error analysis and risk classification confirmed high reliability and low variance. The proposed system demonstrates the feasibility of using AI to personalize fitness plans at scale. It offers a pathway to integrate precision fitness with national policy, supporting equitable and effective public health strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.