ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Definitions and operationalizations of pediatric chronic patients: a scoping review.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathogen and Patient Characteristics and the Severity of Viral Respiratory Infections in Children.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Online Health-Seeking Behavior Among Primary Caregivers of Children with Chronic Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of eHealth Literacy, Caregiver Characteristics, and Child Clinical Context.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are significant inconsistencies in the description of different chronic pediatric patient categories, their corresponding definitions and operationalizations. These inconsistencies hamper shared understanding in clinical practice, research and policy-making. To move forward in this field, this scoping review aimed to provide an overview of these definitions and operationalizations. Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane library and CINAHL were searched for studies published between 2019 and 2023, with definitions of patient categories referring to children aged 0-18 years with a chronic condition. Studies selection and data extraction were conducted independently by multiple reviewers. The data synthesis emerged from an iterative process conducted by the research team. Of the 3570 studies, 522 studies contained a definition of a patient category and were included in the review. In 428 studies (82%), 11 definitions were identified, describing eight commonly used patient categories. In 177 (34%) studies, the definition of the pediatric patient category was operationalized. Fifteen different operationalization tools were found.
conclusionOur review reveals the heterogeneous formulation and interchangeable use of definitions of pediatric chronic patients. A minority of studies reported the use of operationalization tools. Achieving consensus on factors that define different patient categories, along with greater uniformity in operationalization tools is needed to enhance the quality and comparability of research, support the quality of clinical care, and enable more efficient use of healthcare resources. WHAT IS KNOWN: • There is significant heterogeneity in definitions and operationalizations of different chronic pediatric patient categories. WHAT IS NEW: • This scoping review provides an overview of the existing definitions and operationalization tools. • Only a minority of studies report on the use of operationalization tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.