Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286358›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Definitions and operationalizations of pediatric chronic patients: a scoping review.

Cor-Jan van der Perk, Lisa-Maria van Klaveren, Karlijn S Timmer, Heleen N Haspels, Faridi S Jamaludin, Lotte Haverman, Willem B de Vries, Anne M Eskes, Jolanda M Maaskant

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cor-Jan van der PerkAmsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. c.j.vanderperk@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3024-4068
Lisa-Maria van KlaverenAmsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2281-3806
Karlijn S TimmerAmsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4632-841X
Heleen N HaspelsAmsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9367-3487
Faridi S JamaludinResearch Support, Medical Library, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1452-1769
Lotte HavermanAmsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7849-0562
Willem B de VriesAmsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anne M EskesDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1605-0195
Jolanda M MaaskantAmsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1130-1795

Funding

Amsterdam University Medical Centers Anna Reijnvaan Promotion Grant - SWO 2024/008.2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are significant inconsistencies in the description of different chronic pediatric patient categories, their corresponding definitions and operationalizations. These inconsistencies hamper shared understanding in clinical practice, research and policy-making. To move forward in this field, this scoping review aimed to provide an overview of these definitions and operationalizations. Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane library and CINAHL were searched for studies published between 2019 and 2023, with definitions of patient categories referring to children aged 0-18 years with a chronic condition. Studies selection and data extraction were conducted independently by multiple reviewers. The data synthesis emerged from an iterative process conducted by the research team. Of the 3570 studies, 522 studies contained a definition of a patient category and were included in the review. In 428 studies (82%), 11 definitions were identified, describing eight commonly used patient categories. In 177 (34%) studies, the definition of the pediatric patient category was operationalized. Fifteen different operationalization tools were found.

conclusionOur review reveals the heterogeneous formulation and interchangeable use of definitions of pediatric chronic patients. A minority of studies reported the use of operationalization tools. Achieving consensus on factors that define different patient categories, along with greater uniformity in operationalization tools is needed to enhance the quality and comparability of research, support the quality of clinical care, and enable more efficient use of healthcare resources. WHAT IS KNOWN: • There is significant heterogeneity in definitions and operationalizations of different chronic pediatric patient categories. WHAT IS NEW: • This scoping review provides an overview of the existing definitions and operationalization tools. • Only a minority of studies report on the use of operationalization tools.

Indexed as

PediatricsTerminology as TopicAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolChronic DiseaseHumansInfantInfant, NewbornChronic conditionsDefinitionsOperationalizationsPediatricScoping review

Identifiers

PMID41286358
PMCPMC12644160

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.