ArticleCommunications biology2025
The effective connectome over a century of human life.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain functional connectomes describe the coordination principles of neural systems. Understanding normative developmental connectomes is crucial for standardized growth assessment and early disease detection. However, functional connectome has been mostly studied using undirected functional connectivity estimated based on statistical correlation of functional MRI (fMRI) signals. Effective connectivity (EC), in comparison, builds on a generative model of neural interactions and provides directed connectivity strengths among neural populations. To understand how EC evolves with age, we charted the lifespan effective connectome of human brain networks based on high-quality fMRI data from the Lifespan Human Connectome Projects. We found that global and network EC follows an overall inverted U-shape development with an average maturation time at around 9 years of age, significantly earlier than functional connectivity. Regional EC strength exhibits diverse evolution patterns and is more variable during early development than later life, underscoring a critical early window of plasticity. Also, maturation of excitatory and inhibitory nodal EC follows opposite hierarchical sequences. Moreover, the development of nodal EC is constrained by the sensorimotor-association (S-A) gradient, primarily governed by inhibitory EC. Our work reveals fundamental development principles of directed causal interactions between functional networks, offering a foundation for more precise and individualized brain assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.