Trial reportLasers in surgery and medicine2025
A Novel Neurocosmetic Postprocedure Cream for Optimal Recovery and Tolerability From Energy-Based Devices.
Trial report in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Single-Center, Double-Blinded, Split-Face, Controlled Study Evaluating Procedure Pairing of a Post-Procedure Cream Versus a Comparator in Patients Treated With Fractional Ablative CO2 Laser for Facial Rejuvenation
A Randomized, Multi-Center, Double-Blinded, Split-Face, Controlled Study Evaluating Procedure Pairing of a Post-Procedure Cream Versus a Comparator in Patients Treated With a Hybrid-Factional Laser for Facial Rejuvenation
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Novel Neurocosmetic Postprocedure Cream for Optimal Recovery and Tolerability From Energy-Based Devices.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesA neurocosmetic post-procedure cream (NPPC) was developed as a semi-breathable topical to provide relief and recovery following energy-based device treatments. The NPPC was investigated following hybrid fractional and fractional ablative laser resurfacing to assess tolerability, safety, and patient compliance and retention, as well as compare against a conventional post-procedure topical routine.
methodsTwo randomized, double-blinded, split-face, controlled, procedure-pairing studies were conducted with healthy females aged 35-65 years with Fitzpatrick Skin Types I-III and moderate to severe photodamage. Subjects were randomized to apply the NPPC and a comparator moisturizer (CM) or comparator anhydrous formulation (CAF) three times daily for 7 days post-hybrid fractional laser (HFL) or 14 days post-fractional ablative CO
resultsSixteen and twenty-two healthy female subjects completed the HFL and FACL studies, respectively. The NPPC was effective at improving erythema, edema, dryness, burning, itching, stinging, and discomfort as evidenced by tolerability evaluations, clinical photography, and questionnaires. There were no significant adverse events. Day 1 post-FACL treatment, 91% of subjects favorably agreed "the product calmed my skin." Patient relief and recovery were achieved with the NPPC. Across the two studies, the NPPC performed similarly or better than the conventional postprocedure topical routine investigated. The studies are limited to a small sample size, and the lack of a vehicle-only or untreated control arm is unethical.
conclusionsAn NPPC developed to soothe skin following energy-based device procedures demonstrated patient tolerability, safety, and improved healing time following hybrid and fractional ablative laser treatments. Patients indicated favorable responses to the treatments, and there was high agreement that they would return for a second treatment, denoting patient retention. The NPPC achieved comparable outcomes versus the conventional postprocedure topical routine in both HFL and FACL studies. CLINICAL
trial registration1. HFL Study: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06436261 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06436261?term=NCT06436261&rank=1 2. FACL Study: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06366503 https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/study/NCT06366503?term=NCT06366503&rank=1 ClinicalTrials.gov registration was completed after study completion for journal publication purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.