Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025
Effect of intraoperative intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine on postoperative ileus in parturients undergoing cesarean section with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: a single center, prospective, double blind, randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dexmedetomidine and Postoperative Gastrointestinal Recovery: A Critical Narrative Review of Direct Enteric and Opioid-Sparing Pathways.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effect of intraoperative intravenous dexmedetomidine on postoperative ileus in parturients with a previous cesarean scar undergoing elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.
methodsIn this prospective, double-blind trial, 78 parturients (ASA physical status II, aged 18-45 years) scheduled for elective cesarean section with a history of lower-segment cesarean section were randomly assigned to receive either dexmedetomidine (n = 39) or normal saline (n = 39). Following umbilical cord clamping, the dexmedetomidine group received a loading dose of 1 µg·kg⁻¹ over 10 min, followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.5 µg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ until the end of surgery. The control group received an equivalent volume of saline at the same infusion rate. The primary outcome was time to first flatus. Secondary outcomes included time to first defecation, incidence of abdominal distension, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), the requirement for rescue analgesia within 24 h, and length of hospital stay.
resultsBaseline characteristics were comparable between groups (all P > 0.05). Compared with the control group, the dexmedetomidine group demonstrated significantly shorter times to first flatus (23.5 ± 6.8 h vs. 32.1 ± 8.7 h; P < 0.001) and first defecation (41.5 ± 8.3 h vs. 57.5 ± 16.8 h; P < 0.001), as well as a lower incidence of abdominal distension (10.3% vs. 32.4%; P < 0.05). In addition, the dexmedetomidine group had lower incidence of PONV at 24 h (7.7% vs. 32.4%; P = 0.007) and required less rescue analgesia within 24 h (10.3% vs. 29.7%; P = 0.033). The requirement for intraoperative atropine for bradycardia was significantly higher in the dexmedetomidine group (28.2% vs. 8.1%; P = 0.024).
conclusionIntraoperative intravenous dexmedetomidine significantly accelerates postoperative gastrointestinal recovery, reduces the incidence of postoperative ileus and related adverse events, and shortens hospital stay in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.
trial registrationThe trial was prospectively registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) prior to patient enrollment (registration number: ChiCTR2300068136, date of registration: February 8, 2023; URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=185474 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.