ArticleBMC genomics2025
X chromosome inactivation across primary human tissues is mostly complete, with significant implications for genetic and clinical studies.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundX chromosome inactivation (XCI) refers to silencing of genes on one copy of the X chromosome in XX females, resulting in dosage compensation between XX females and XY males. Genes can escape this silencing, potentially leading to sex-based differences in disease.
resultsAcross three primary tissue types, we determined XCI status by integrating whole-genome sequencing with bulk RNA-Seq data to assess allele-specific expression (ASE) at heterozygous SNPs. Across all genes and tissues, the average percentage of individuals showing escape was 4.7%. We show that models of full dosage compensation and no dosage compensation are strongly correlated over most parameter space. For G6PD deficiency, we illustrate that in G6PD*B/G6PD*A- heterozygotes, even if silencing is complete and escape is not associated with disease risk, the allele that is expressed can affect mRNA abundance.
conclusionsWith respect to studies of the genetic architecture of complex traits, our results suggest that a model of full dosage compensation, although not strictly correct for much of chromosome X, is more appropriate than a model of no dosage compensation. We conclude that uncertainty about the model of dosage compensation should not be an impediment to analysis of chromosome X in genetic epidemiology studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.