SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Risk factors of nosocomial infection after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo summarize the risk factors for Nosocomial Infection(NI) in patients after Percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).
methodsThe databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biological Medical Database (CBM), Chinese Wanfang Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) were searched for relevant articles from its inception to November 2024. This meta-analysis is based on RevMan5.4 software. The results' robustness was assessed using sensitivity analysis, and publication bias was assessed using Egger's test and funnel plot. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
resultsTwenty-six studies were included, involving 18,825 patients. The meta-analysis showed that: combined diabetes(Patients with post-PCI infection had diabetes) [OR = 2.17, 95%(1.52,3.10)], mechanical ventilation [OR = 4.39, 95%(2.95,6.53)], indwelling urinary catheter [OR = 4.28, 95%(2.66,6.89)], age ≥ 60 years [OR = 1.96, 95%(1.50,2.57)], invasive procedures [OR = 2.72, 95%(1.99,3.71)], somking [OR = 1.88, 95%(1.18,2.99)], cardiac function classification of III to IV [OR = 3.14, 95%(2.03,4.88)], implantation of ≥ 2 stents [OR = 2.36, 95%(1.13,4.93)], and hospitalization days ≥ 14 [OR = 2.36, 95%(1.01,5.52)] were the predictive factors for the development of NI in post-PCI patients. The most common infecting bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus species, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The sites of infection were predominantly respiratory and urinary.
conclusionsThis systematic review discusses the risk factors that lead to NI in post-PCI patients. Healthcare professionals may combine these factors to develop targeted interventions to reduce the incidence of infections and promote patient recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.