Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286807›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Machine learning vs. traditional logistic regression: predictive performance and risk factor identification for child nutritional outcome in Pakistan.

Muhammad Shahid, Muhammad Ali Yahya, Jiayi Song, Hafiz Muhammad Naveed, Serhat Yuksel, Hasan Dincer, Muhammad Ali

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhammad ShahidCollege of Management, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P. R. China. Muhammadshahid.15.pk@gmail.com.
Muhammad Ali YahyaDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan.
Jiayi SongDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Hafiz Muhammad NaveedCollege of Management, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P. R. China.
Serhat YukselSchool of Business, İSTANBUL MEDİPOL University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hasan DincerSchool of Business, İSTANBUL MEDİPOL University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Muhammad AliDepartment of Economics, Al-Madinah International University, Kuala Lampur, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Logistic regression (LR) has long been the standard econometric tool for modeling child nutritional outcomes in public health research. However, conventional econometric LR (CE-LR) faces limitations in predictive accuracy, reliance on restrictive assumptions, and handling high-dimensional data. Machine learning-enhanced LR (ML-LR)-which relaxes the strict statistical assumptions of traditional models to better capture complex patterns-combined with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), offers a promising alternative, improving both prediction and interpretability of risk factors. This study presents the first Pakistan-specific application and comparison of ML-LR (with SHAP analysis) against CE-LR, introducing a novel hybrid framework that combines predictive power with interpretability for policy-relevant insights using nationally representative data from Pakistan's 2017-2018 Demographic and Health Survey (n = 4,098 children under five). Results indicate persistent malnutrition rates: stunting (38.13%), underweight (23.04%), and wasting (8.05%). The ML-LR model identified all 13 hypothesized risk factors as significant, while CE-LR detected only six. Crucially, ML-LR captured key predictors missed by CE-LR, such as maternal BMI, employment, and dietary diversity. The SHAP analysis further revealed nuanced relationships: child age, low maternal BMI, unemployment, and unimproved water increased malnutrition risk, while higher birth order, adequate dietary diversity (if children were given ≥ 5 food items), maternal education, and male gender had protective effects. Crucially, ML-LR + SHAP uncovered context-dependent relationships invisible to CE-LR. For example, dietary diversity operated bidirectionally-low diversity was a risk factor, while adequate diversity was protective-a distinction CE-LR failed to capture. These findings demonstrate ML-LR's superior ability to model complex, heterogeneous determinants of child malnutrition. The study advocates for integrating ML techniques with explainable AI (e.g., SHAP) in econometric analyses to enhance policy-relevant insights in public health.

Indexed as

Child Nutrition DisordersMachine LearningChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLogistic ModelsMalePakistanRisk FactorsChild NutritionEconometricsLogistic RegressionMachine LearningPredictive ModelingRisk Factors IdentificationSHAP Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41286807
PMCPMC12917996

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.