ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Comparison of the acute effects of traditional and reaction-based HIIT on brain connectivity and cognitive responses.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to comparatively investigate the acute effects of traditional and reaction-based HIIT (High Intensity Interval Training) methods on brain connectivity and cognitive responses. A total of 33 athletes (17 female, 16 male), 3 from each of the elite shooting, badminton, basketball, gymnastics, football, softball, karate, taekwondo, tennis, swimming and volleyball branches, were included in the study. The average age of the athletes included in the study was 21.4 ± 1.8 years and the average sports history was 9.4 ± 2.9 years. The athletes were equally and randomly distributed to traditional HIIT (11), reaction-based HIIT (11) and control groups (11). First, 2-min eyes-open resting EEG recordings were taken from the athletes. After the resting records, the Stroop Test consisting of 100 images (50% compatible) was applied in a computer environment and EEG records were taken simultaneously. The athletes applied a 5-min run and warm-up exercises. At the end of the warm-up period, the athletes applied 10 min of HIIT according to their groups. After the completion of HIIT, rating of perceived exertion was applied to determine the perceived exertion. Finally, the Stroop post-tests simultaneously with the EEG of all groups were taken and the measurement process was completed. All measurements related to the research were carried out at 23.1 °C (± 0.17) ambient temperature in Gazi University, Faculty of Sports Sciences Wrestling Hall. Three-way repeated measures ANOVA and independent groups T-Test were applied to the data obtained from the athletes in R and SPSS statistical programs. According to the obtained findings, significant differences were detected between the fronto-temporal, fronto-occipital, occipito-temporal regions in terms of connectivity and between the groups in terms of perceived difficulty level (p < 0.05). As a result of the research, in terms of brain connectivity; While the reaction-based HIIT method was observed to have positive effects on cognitive processes such as focused attention and decision-making skills by increasing synchronization especially in the fronto-temporal regions; it was observed that the traditional HIIT method decreased the perception of effort of the activity by decreasing the synchronization in the fronto-occipital region and contributed positively to the visual information processing processes by increasing the synchronization in the occipito-temporal region. In addition, although the heart rates of both groups were similar during HIIT, the reaction-based HIIT group perceived a higher level of difficulty than the traditional HIIT group. In the light of these results, it can be said that the use of applications that include unpredictability and variable environmental conditions, such as reaction-based HIIT, more in the development of athletic performance can make the applied training method more functional in cognitive terms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.