SynthesisGlobalization and health2025
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of second-generation mothers in Europe: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Globalization and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSecond-generation mothers (SGMs), born in European countries to foreign-born parents, represent a growing population. While disparities in maternal and neonatal health outcomes among first-generation migrants and natives are well documented, less is known about these outcomes among SGMs. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize evidence on maternal and neonatal health outcomes among SGMs, comparing them to both native-born women and first-generation migrants.
methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases up to December 2024, for studies reporting on maternal and/or neonatal outcomes in SGMs in Europe. Eligible studies were critically appraised, and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted where possible to obtain pooled, unadjusted odds ratios.
resultsA total of 19 studies were included, mostly conducted in Germany and Nordic countries. SGMs had a lower risk of C-section compared to natives (pooled OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.60-0.78). They also seemed to have a higher risk of late access to antenatal care (ANC) and of gestational diabetes, although not significant for the latter. For other outcomes, such as near-miss, low birth weight and preterm birth, included studies reported conflicting results or the pooled estimates were not significant. The generalizability of findings is strongly affected by the limited number of studies, data heterogeneity and underrepresentation of key migrant groups and countries.
conclusionsStructural factors, acculturation, and persistent inequalities may shape health trajectories across generations. Late access to ANC highlights that SGMs still face barriers in accessing care, despite being born and educated in host countries. Improved data collection, disaggregation by parental background, and attention to social determinants are essential to better understand and address the needs of this growing population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.