ArticleHuman genomics2025
Integrative transcriptomic profiling and machine learning reveal hypoxia-associated molecular signatures for precision diagnosis in thyroid eye disease.
Article in Human genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Management of Thyroid Eye Disease: A Comparison Between Three Recent Clinical Guidelines.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThyroid eye disease (TED) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by persistent inflammation around the periphery and within the orbit, potentially driven by hypoxic conditions. Effective biomarkers and precise predictive models are still lacking for the early diagnosis of TED.
methodsBulk RNA sequencing was conducted on peripheral blood samples from TED patients, Graves' hyperthyroidism (GH) patients without ocular involvement, and healthy controls (HC). Differentially expressed genes between TED and HC, hypoxia-related genes and genes identified through weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) were intersected to identify candidate biomarkers. Subsequently, nine machine learning algorithms were applied to screen for critical hypoxia-related TED diagnostic genes (HRTDGs). A diagnostic model based on HRTDG score (HRTDGS) was constructed using logistic regression analyses and then evaluated. TED patients were categorized into high and low HRTDGS groups based on the median score. Distinct immunological profiles and underlying pathological functions were investigated between two groups. Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data further explored HRTDGs' roles at cellular level.
resultsHypoxia was identified as a prominent feature of TED. Among all machine learning algorithms, random forest achieved the highest area under curve (AUC) and was used to identify three key HRTDGs: EGFR, PIK3CB, and CREBBP. The HRTDGS model was then established and found to be an independent predictive factor for TED diagnosis (odds ratio (OR): 2.656, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.735-4.324, p < 0.001). The model demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing TED from both HC (AUC = 0.785 in training set and 0.905 in testing set) and GH (AUC = 0.935). TED patients with higher HRTDGS exhibited elevated levels of thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TRAb) and abnormal free thyroxine (fT4), along with greater infiltration by activated CD4 + T cells and natural killer (NK) cells. ScRNA-seq revealed elevated expression of HRTDGs in fibroblasts, NK and CD4 + T cells, with enriched EGFR signaling pathway between T/NK cells and fibroblasts in TED compared to HC.
conclusionsThis study presents a novel hypoxia biomarkers-based diagnostic model for TED, facilitating early detection and offering valuable insights into potential therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.