ReviewInternational journal for equity in health2025
Setting priorities for healthcare interventions in Indonesia: a comprehensive conceptual framework.
Review in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Childhood immunization barriers and interventions in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review of access, delivery systems, and health literacy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Determinants of stunting among Indonesian children: a cross-sectional study on the role of child, maternal, and vaccination factors.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Medicine Requirements and Budget Implication for Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Indonesia: A Morbidity-Based Approach.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients with Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia Receiving Clozapine-Based Therapy in South Kalimantan, Indonesia.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Activity-Based Costing of COVID-19 RT-PCR Testing in Public Laboratories in Indonesia: Evidence for Tariff Setting.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health priority setting is a fundamental aspect of public health decision-making in Indonesia, a country characterized by its vast geographic diversity, large population, and evolving healthcare challenges. Given the complex and varied health needs across the country, effective prioritization of healthcare interventions is essential for optimizing resource allocation and improving health outcomes. This study aims to explore the current healthcare priority-setting strategies in Indonesia and identify opportunities to enhance their implementation to support the achievement of universal health coverage (UHC). We conducted a narrative review of relevant literature using the medical databases PubMed and EMBASE, supplemented by a manual review of reference lists and key policy documents. Key findings reveal that the criteria for health intervention prioritization in Indonesia include disease burden, intervention effectiveness, cost, acceptability, and fairness. However, challenges persist in the consistent application of these criteria across Indonesia’s diverse regions, further compounded by disparities in infrastructure, governance, and data availability. In terms of healthcare priority setting, Indonesia combines technical approaches like Health Technology Assessment and Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis with value-based methods such as the Delphi Technique and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, focusing on equity, fairness, and stakeholder engagement. Limitations in current approaches for healthcare priority setting further complicate the process. Additionally, ethical and social considerations sometimes conflict with economic or technical priorities, underscoring the need for continuous evaluation and adaptation of health priority setting practices. These complexities highlight that while Indonesia has made significant strides, areas for improvement remain to ensure equitable and effective healthcare allocation. Using Indonesia as a reference case, this paper emphasizes the importance of integrating evidence-based priority setting within the framework of UHC to improve healthcare access and equity in Indonesia. This analysis equips stakeholders with the knowledge necessary to navigate Indonesia’s complex healthcare landscape and drive initiatives aimed at achieving better health outcomes and the well-being of its population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.