Evidence mapPaperPMID 41287213Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2026

Genenames.org: the HGNC and PGNC resources in 2026.

Ruth L Seal, Bryony Braschi, Kristian Gray, James McClay, Susan Tweedie, Elspeth A Bruford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruth L SealHUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee, Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge CB2 0PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7545-6817
Bryony BraschiHUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee, Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge CB2 0PT, UK.
Kristian GrayHUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee, Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge CB2 0PT, UK.
James McClayHUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee, Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge CB2 0PT, UK.
Susan TweedieHUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee, Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge CB2 0PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1818-8243
Elspeth A BrufordHUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee, Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge CB2 0PT, UK.

Funding

Cambridge UniversityNational Institutes of Healt U24HG003345NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG003345Oxford University PressU.S. Department of Energy DE-AC05-00OR22725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC), based at the University of Cambridge, approves unique symbols and descriptive names for human genes. The HGNC database currently contains over 44 400 approved gene symbols, over 19 250 of which represent protein-coding genes, ∼14 500 represent pseudogenes, and over 9500 represent non-coding RNA genes. The public website, www.genenames.org, displays all approved nomenclature within manually curated Symbol Reports and also displays related groups of genes in Gene Group Reports. In 2024, we formed the Plant Gene Nomenclature Committee (PGNC), which has been approving gene symbols and names for the tree species Populus trichocarpa. All approved plant gene nomenclature is displayed on the new website plant.genenames.org. Here, we review updates to the HGNC project and introduce the PGNC project.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenes, PlantTerminology as TopicHumansInternetPopulusPseudogenes

Identifiers

PMID41287213
PMCPMC12807706

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.