ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Research By Us, For Us: Violence Prevention Professional Researchers Lead Measure Development for HVIPs.
Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematizing and Optimizing Collection of Patient-reported Outcomes after Community-based Care: A Quality Improvement Project.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
- Special Collection on Community-Led Strategies to Reduce Gun Violence: Developing Evidence for Policy and Practice: An Editorial.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hospital-based violence intervention programs (HVIPs) address intervention and prevention of community-based interpersonal violence. HVIPs employ Violence Prevention Professionals (VPPs) as first responders to the hospital bedside for patients who present with injuries resulting from community-based interpersonal violence, including firearm injury, stab wounds, and assault. Despite the growing presence of HVIPs in the U.S., the model lacks process and outcome measures to gauge program fidelity and effectiveness. This study utilized a research team of predominantly VPP researchers to conduct key informant interviews with 3 key groups of participants engaged with a regional HVIP, including clients (n = 7), VPPs (n = 9), and healthcare collaborators (n = 8). Analysis of interview data produced 6 overarching themes, including 3 process-based themes: (1) establish the relationship with the hospital site(s) and clients; (2) foundational client engagement; (3) The Work, and 3 outcome-based themes: (1) transition from relationship to partnership; (2) ongoing commitment; (3) The Change that span hospital- to community-based care. Further, the team identified 4 foundational programmatic goals of the HVIP: (1) inspire positive personal change, (2) reduce engagement in violence and other high-risk activity, 3) reduce risk of reinjury and justice system involvement, and (4) reignite young people as beacons of hope. The 6 process-and outcome-related themes and the 4 foundational programmatic goals produced a conceptual framework for the HVIP and a logic model that maps with the conceptual framework. These elements can guide evaluation of HVIP fidelity and effectiveness. Future work can explore the application of these measures at other sites to build the evidence base of the HVIP models in violence intervention and prevention of community-based interpersonal violence, as well as further define the role HVIPs play within the CVI ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.