Article in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
5 authors.
David Andrés GonzálezDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Centerhttps://ror.org/01j7c0b24, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0882-7689
Cecilia ZunigaDepartment of Neurology and Mulva Clinic for the Neurosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
objectivesInstrumental activities of daily living (iADLs) are critical in aging and neurodegenerative research, both diagnostically (e.g., distinguishing dementia from mild cognitive impairment) and as endpoints for trials maintaining or improving functioning. However, measurement has not consistently kept pace with a changed world wherein the ability to navigate technology is pertinent to maintaining independent functioning. The current study used harmonization approaches to link traditional and technological iADLs measures using two samples.
resultsCorrelations verified the measures were sufficiently related (
conclusionThis study provides critical information for harmonizing evolving technological iADLs with traditional iADLs that are assessed in longstanding cohorts. It further provides support for use of an expanded FAQ.
Indexed as
Daily functioningdementiaFunctional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ)instrumental activities of daily living (iADLs)item response theorytechnology
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.