ReviewJournal of Korean medical science2025
Refining Western Dementia-Risk Paradigms: Evidence From a Decade of the Korean Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging and Dementia.
Review in Journal of Korean medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Mobile Application Intervention for Emotional Health in Older Adults: Designed for Dementia Prevention.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Domain-Specific Cognitive Concordance in Older Married Couples.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Self-Reported Driving Problems Predict Future Traffic Crashes in Older Men: Prevalence and Determinants of Unrecognized Imminent Risk.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Tinnitus severity and chronicity in relation to hearing loss: a population-based study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Revisiting the Geriatric Depression Scale: An IRT-Based 10-Item Screen Outperforms the GDS-15 in Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the most rapidly aging nation, Korea offers a unique lens into the future of dementia, one of the most pressing global health challenges of the 21st century. The Korean Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging and Dementia (KLOSCAD), launched amid the country's rapid demographic transition, exemplifies how population-specific research can guide national policy and challenge universal assumptions in dementia science. More than a cohort study, KLOSCAD provides a methodological blueprint for identifying culturally relevant risk factors, testing the applicability of Western models, and shaping prevention strategies for local contexts. Its evolution from a national study to a globally recognized platform reflects the value of sustained governmental support, strategic design, and international collaboration. As the dementia epidemic's center shifts to Asia, the KLOSCAD experience underscores that diversity is not a confounder but a scientific opportunity, critical for building both universal and context-sensitive approaches to understanding and preventing dementia worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.