ArticleYonsei medical journal2025
Is Chest Imaging Alone Adequate for Diagnosing Interstitial Lung Disease in Microscopic Polyangiitis Based on the 2022 Criteria?
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the concordance rate between chest imaging and lung biopsy results for interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and to compare their clinical utility for MPA classification. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study included 24 patients who had both chest imaging and lung biopsy results at diagnosis and who fulfiled the 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria for MPA. Concordance was defined as the concurrent confirmation of ILD on chest imaging and lung biopsy. Positive and negative predictive values were assessed in patients with and without ILD on chest imaging, respectively, and compared with histologically confirmed ILD on lung biopsy.
resultsThe median age was 73.5 years, and all patients had myeloperoxidase (MPO)-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody. Among the 24 patients, 10 (41.7%) and 5 (20.8%) exhibited radiological and histological findings consistent with ILD, respectively. Among the 10 patients with radiological findings of ILD, only 4 exhibited histological features consistent with ILD on lung biopsy, leading to a concordance rate of 40%. Conversely, among the remaining 14 patients without radiological findings of ILD, 13 showed histological features inconsistent with ILD on lung biopsy, resulting in a concordance rate of 92.9%.
conclusionLung biopsy should be considered in highly selected patients who are MPO-positive without involvement of other organs. The decision to determine the need for lung biopsy should be made by a multidisciplinary team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.