ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025
Extracellular Trap-Related Genes as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Endometriosis.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeting the Immune Network in Endometriosis: A Comprehensive Review of Pathogenesis, Immunomodulation, and Emerging Therapies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endometriosis (EM), a prevalent gynecological disorder in reproductive-age women, lacks reliable noninvasive diagnostic tools. EM may be detected by neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which are essential to inflammation and immunological regulation. This research utilized 13 machine learning algorithms to improve the predictive precision of the diagnostic model and pinpointed four potential biomarkers that could aid in the diagnosis of EM. Methods: Using the GSE141549 dataset, we combined differentially expressed genes with NETs-related markers to identify key genes linked to EM. We performed functional analysis to understand their biological roles. Through 13 machine learning methods, we built 107 different models and selected four central genes: CEACAM1, FOS, PLA2G2A, and THBS1. We developed a diagnostic model, evaluating its performance with ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis; its robustness was rigorously assessed through 10-fold cross-validation. Results: The four-gene model demonstrated superior performance, with high accuracy in the training set (AUC: 0.962), robust generalizability in cross-validation (mean AUC: 0.975) and external cohorts, confirmed clinical utility, and consistent gene expression across multiple datasets. Conclusion: This study identifies CEACAM1, FOS, PLA2G2A, and THBS1 as promising biomarkers for endometriosis. Their association with immune infiltration may improve early detection strategies, highlighting the potential for developing non-invasive diagnostic tools for EM in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.