ReviewCureus2025
Barriers to Antenatal Care Attendance in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors associated with utilisation of antenatal care visit services in Nepal: evidence from Demographic and Health Survey 2016-2022.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Risk Factors and Awareness of Preeclampsia Among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Care in Nasarawa State.Public health challenges · 2026Article
- Hierarchical machine learning models for predicting antenatal care utilisation among Nigerian women: Identifying actionable insights for health policy.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Exploring barriers and facilitators of providing maternal healthcare in Africa: systematic review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attendance of antenatal care (ANC) is very crucial in enhancing the health of mothers and fetuses, and many barriers deny women in developing nations the opportunity to receive this important service. This systematic review aimed to identify the major obstacles and facilitators of ANC attendance and explore the determinants of healthcare use in pregnant women. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published between 2015 and 2025. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. These cross-country studies (in Ethiopia, Nigeria, Tanzania, Bangladesh, and Malawi) revealed information on the socioeconomic, cultural, and healthcare system barriers that women are challenged by. The review identified financial constraints, transportation issues, and cultural beliefs as the primary barriers to attending antenatal care. Facilitators associated with this were community-based health programs, male participation, and enhanced healthcare facilities. Specifically, Tanzanian and Ethiopian studies have highlighted the role of health education and community health workers (CHWs) in facilitating ANC attendance. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for non-randomized studies, and the majority of studies demonstrated a low to moderate risk. The results indicate that overcoming economic and cultural barriers, along with improving healthcare access, is crucial for increasing ANC attendance. The interventions that can improve maternal health outcomes include empowerment initiatives, community-based programs, and strategies to enhance transportation access. Future studies should be guided by longitudinal designs and randomized experiments to determine the long-term effects of these interventions on ANC attendance and maternal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.