ArticleCureus2025
Clinico Microbiological Profile of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Retrospective Study of Infections and Antibiotic Susceptibility in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Article
- Five-Year Evolution of the Microbiological Landscape of Diabetic Foot Infections (2021-2025): Rising Polymicrobial Gram-Negative Predominance and Emergence of Resistant Enterobacterales at a Single Large-Volume Outpatient Centre.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimDiabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a frequent and critical complication associated with diabetes mellitus. They carry a higher risk of infection, longer hospital stays, and increased healthcare costs. This study aimed to identify the microbiological profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of organisms isolated from infected diabetic foot ulcers. MATERIAL AND
methodsA retrospective, record-based, cross-sectional study was conducted by retrieving data on culture isolates obtained from diabetic foot ulcers and the clinical data of these patients over a period of two years (from August 2022 to August 2024) at a tertiary care hospital. The demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were retrieved from the laboratory information system; all data were entered into an Excel spreadsheet (Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corp.), and the variables were analyzed.
resultsA total of 100 patients with DFUs, and the details of 156 samples obtained from the diabetic foot ulcers of these patients, were included in the study. Among the 100 patients, the majority were male (76%, 76/100), and the age group most commonly affected was 50-60 years (40%, 40/100). Pus was the predominant sample (41.7%, 65/156) among the total 156 samples collected. Among the 156 samples collected, 62.2% (97/156) showed mono-microbial growth, and 37.8% (59/156) showed poly-microbial growth. The total number of bacterial and fungal isolates was 213 and five, respectively. All fungal isolates were identified to be
conclusionThis study has enhanced our understanding of the epidemiology of diabetic foot ulcers by identifying common pathogens. The antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the pathogens will help clinicians provide better empirical therapy, thereby promoting faster wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.