ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Breast cancer diagnosis at age 85 and older.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLimited data is available on patients diagnosed with breast cancer at age 85 and older, and there is no consensus on mammographic screening guidelines for older women, including those with a history of breast cancer. We sought to describe characteristics of presentation in this patient population and to determine whether differences exist between older women with a history of breast cancer and those without.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted of all female patients aged 85 and older who consulted a breast surgeon for a diagnosis of new or recurrent breast cancer.
resultsFrom January 1, 2009 to September 30, 2024, 132 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent breast cancer were identified. Mean age was 88.3 years (range 85-99). Ninety patients (68.2%) were diagnosed with breast cancer for the first time and the remainder (42; 31.8%) had a history of breast cancer. 57.1% of patients with a history of breast cancer were diagnosed on screening imaging compared to 31.1% with no prior history, who more commonly were diagnosed based on symptoms. In patients with a history of breast cancer, there was a mean time of 14.6 years from index cancer to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and 19.2 years from index cancer to contralateral cancer event. DISCUSSION: Roughly one-third of patients had a prior breast cancer and were significantly more likely to be diagnosed on screening studies compared to women who did not have a history of breast cancer. Women without a history of breast cancer were more likely to be symptomatic at the time of diagnosis and more likely to be diagnosed at a later disease stage. In patients with a prior breast cancer, second breast cancer events tended to happen late, which raises the question of how long screening should continue after a breast cancer diagnosis in older patients and whether guidelines should distinguish between those with a prior history of breast cancer and those without.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41288755What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.