ReviewBritish medical bulletin2025
A review of occupational noise-induced hearing loss: focus on mechanisms and preventive measures.
Review in British medical bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cochlear synaptic vulnerability scales with pathological noise intensity in a noise-induced hearing loss model.Genes & genomics · 2026Article
- Impact of Occupational Noise Exposure on Physical and Mental Health of Water Pumping Station Operators in Lebanon.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Association between occupational noise-induced hearing loss and cognitive function: a multimodal cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Tertiary music students' hearing health behaviors: ignorance is not bliss.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Mesenchymal vs. induced pluripotent stem cells: potential for spiral ganglion neuron regeneration in auditory neuropathy.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of Workplace Noise-risk Classification with Hearing Protection in Preventing Occupational Hearing Loss.Noise & healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis research investigates the epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and prevention strategies associated with occupational noise-induced hearing loss (ONIHL), while also presenting effective control measures. SOURCE OF DATA: Relevant literature was sourced from databases such as MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, encompassing articles until February 2025. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: ONIHL is widely recognized as a common occupational health issue among workers. Additionally, noise can lead to psychological and physiological complications beyond direct auditory damage. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: The effects of noise differ across individuals, and the precise causes behind ONIHL remain poorly understood, although several pathways have been proposed. GROWING POINTS: New treatment options focused on oxidative stress, inflammation, and neuropathy are being developed through innovative drug delivery systems. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: There is a pressing need for molecular approaches to explore the mechanisms of ONIHL, particularly in the care of individuals with hearing disabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.