ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2026
Estrogen receptor signaling drives immune evasion and immunotherapy resistance in HR+ breast cancer.
Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Micropeptide colorectal neoplasia differentially expressed (CRNDE) 84aa encoded by CRNDE elicits a T-cell immune response to breast cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- The immunology of human breast cancer.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancers (BCs) are typically "immune-cold," poorly immune-infiltrated tumors that do not respond to immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies. Using clinical data, we report that estrogen receptor α (ERα) signaling was associated with immunosuppressive pathways and a lack of response to ICB in patients with HR+ BC. In this study, we validated ER-mediated immunosuppression by engineering and modulating the ER in preclinical models in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo. Mechanistically, we found that ERα hijacked LCOR, a nuclear receptor corepressor, thereby preventing LCOR's function in the induction of tumor immunogenicity and immune infiltration, which is normally observed in the absence of ERα, such as in ER- BC. In HR+ BC, we demonstrate that the molecular disruption of LCOR and ERα interaction using anti-ER therapies or using a mutant of the LCOR nuclear receptor-binding domain (LSKLL into LSKAA) that does not interact with ERα, restored the immunogenic functions of LCOR. Remarkably, the LCOR-ERα disruption converted HR+ BC immune-cold tumors into immune-hot tumors responsive to ICB by increased antigen presentation machinery expression, immune infiltration, T cell recognition, and T cell-mediated killing. In conclusion, ERα inhibition and the disruption of LCOR-ERα interaction represent a therapeutic strategy and an opportunity to elicit immunotherapeutic benefit in patients with HR+ BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.