Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41289037›Full record

ReviewGenome biology and evolution2025

Orphan and de novo Genes in Fungi and Animals: Identification, Origins and Functions.

Ercan Seçkin, Dominique Colinet, Edoardo Sarti, Etienne G J Danchin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ercan SeçkinInstitut Sophia Agrobiotech, INRAE, Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Sophia-Antipolis 06903, France.ORCID 0009-0003-6821-6967
Dominique ColinetInstitut Sophia Agrobiotech, INRAE, Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Sophia-Antipolis 06903, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5122-5072
Edoardo SartiAlgorithms, Biology Structure, Centre Inria at Université Côte d'Azur, Sophia-Antipolis 06902, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2417-1448
Etienne G J DanchinInstitut Sophia Agrobiotech, INRAE, Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Sophia-Antipolis 06903, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4146-5608

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genes that lack identifiable homologs in other species have been an intriguing and interesting topic of research for many years. These so-called orphan genes were first studied in yeast and since then, they have been found in many other species. This has fostered a whole field of research aiming at tracing back their evolutionary origin and functional significance. Orphan genes represent an important part of protein-coding genes in many species. Their presence was initially mainly hypothesized to result from high divergence from a pre-existing gene, with duplications or horizontal gene transfer facilitating their accelerated evolution. More recently, their possible de novo emergence from nongenic regions has gained particular interest. Several orphan genes are predicted to be involved in reproduction, while others are involved in specific developmental stages, in adaptation mechanisms such as freeze protection or even human disease. However, there is currently no unified resource or synthesis that brings together existing knowledge about how prevalent orphan genes are across different species and what their roles might be. In this review, we focus on orphan genes in animals and fungi. We provide a detailed summary of discoveries over time in terms of orphan gene prevalence in genomes, their origins as well as their roles in different biological contexts.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularFungiAnimalsGene Transfer, HorizontalHumansde novo gene birthevolutionorphan genes

Identifiers

PMID41289037
PMCPMC12684174

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.