Observational studyHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2026
Preimplantation genetic testing for neurofibromatosis type 1: molecular genetic aspects and impact on reproductive counseling.
Observational study in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decision-Making Around Preimplantation Genetic Testing by Individuals With Neurofibromatosis Type I: A Qualitative Study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionHow do the genetic complexities of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) impact reproductive counseling, preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) design, and PGT treatment? SUMMARY ANSWER: We established association between both incidence and tissue mosaicism with multiple exon deletions and specific single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in neurofibromin 1 (NF1), a clinical actionable finding that we structured as a flowchart outlining challenges in and an approach for reproductive counseling, PGT design, and PGT treatment for NF1. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: NF1 has a prevalence of 1 in 2500-3000 and is one of the most frequently requested autosomal dominant indications for PGT. NF1 is a large gene with a high mutation rate, resulting in a 50% de novo occurrence, many different reported variants scattered across the gene and relatively frequent mosaicism. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study on PGT molecular design for NF1 in three large PGT centers (n = 281 couples), starting from the first assay for NF1 developed in 2004 until 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsA PGT assay was developed for 281 couples with 218 different variants in NF1. Newly described variants (n = 76) were scored using the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) classification system and submitted prior to publication in the Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD). The employed techniques were PCR-based PGT using short tandem repeat markers (n = 230), SNP-array-based PGT (n = 39), and next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based PGT (n = 12). Minisequencing (SNAPshot) or double amplification refractory mutation system (D-ARMS) was used to incorporate SNVs. Small deletions and insertions were incorporated using fragment length analysis. All PGT assays were designed and validated according to local protocols and ESHRE guidelines. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Mosaicism was present in 8% of the sporadic cases (n = 13/168), of which about half were unknown prior to PGT (n = 6/13). Mosaicism was significantly higher in patients with multiple exon deletions (n = 4/6) as compared to patients with SNVs (n = 9/162) (P < 0.001, Fisher's exact test). Additionally, two recurrent SNVs were significantly associated with mosaicism (P <0.0167, Fisher's exact test). Importantly, three unrelated families with different NF1 variants in close relatives were identified. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Due to its retrospective design, not all details on the genetic test results and clinical phenotype could be retrieved for some cases (n = 6). The extent to which our findings are applicable to centers worldwide depends on their local procedures and legislation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsOur findings substantially impact reproductive counseling for couples with NF1, enabling informed reproductive decision-making. For couples affected with NF1 proceeding with PGT, our findings alert colleagues worldwide on NF1-specific pitfalls in PGT molecular design and treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): There was no funding involved in the research for this publication. M.Z.E. is an inventor on two patent applications: ZL910050-PCT/EP2011/060211-WO/2011/157846 'Methods for haplotyping single cells' and ZL913096-PCT/EP2014/068315-WO/2015/028576 'Haplotyping and copy-number typing using polymorphic variant allelic frequencies'. The other authors have no competing interests to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.