ReviewInternational journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists2026
Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma (MLA) Diagnostic Criteria and Controversies: Perspectives and Guidance From Pathologists in the MLA Consortium.
Review in International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Peritoneal Mesonephric-Like Adenocarcinoma Arising in Endometriosis: Case Report and Review of the Literature Expanding the Spectrum of Extrauterine Mesonephric-Like Adenocarcinomas.International journal of surgical pathology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) is a rare and aggressive gynecologic malignancy that has only been recognized in the last decade. It arises in the endometrium, ovaries, and other extrauterine sites (often in association with endometriosis) and closely mimics a variety of other tumor types that occur in these locations. While it shows significant morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular homology with cervical mesonephric adenocarcinoma, there are many clinicopathologic features that suggest müllerian derivation, and this is now well established. As research on MLA has accumulated, questions have emerged about optimal practices for the diagnosis of these challenging tumors. In 2022, faculty at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center convened the Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma (MLA) Consortium, comprised of international pathologists, gynecologic oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and basic science investigators with expertise in MLA, with the goals to enhance understanding of these tumors, refine diagnostic criteria, improve treatment options, and facilitate research collaborations. An initial review from the consortium was published in 2025, and included diagnostic recommendations from the group's pathologists. Controversies remain, however, about the morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular criteria that should be used to establish a diagnosis of MLA. Herein, the pathologists from the MLA Consortium provide a comprehensive evaluation of the literature on MLA diagnostic criteria, address ongoing controversies in this area, and provide practical guidance for pathologists considering this entity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.