Evidence mapPaperPMID 41289365Full record

ReviewInternational journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists2026

Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma (MLA) Diagnostic Criteria and Controversies: Perspectives and Guidance From Pathologists in the MLA Consortium.

Anne M Mills, Elizabeth D Euscher, W Glenn McCluggage, Jelena Mirkovic, Kay J Park, David L Kolin, Lien Hoang, Hyun-Soo Kim, Jeffrey A How, Karen H Lu and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anne M MillsDepartment of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Elizabeth D EuscherDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
W Glenn McCluggageDepartment of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Jelena MirkovicDepartment of Pathology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kay J ParkDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
David L KolinDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lien HoangDepartment of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Hyun-Soo KimDepartment of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeffrey A HowDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Karen H LuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
Kari L RingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Brooke E HowittDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Funding

The Patient-Reported Outcomes, Community-Engagement and Language (PRO-CEL) CoreP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · 1985 to 2025
$88.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) is a rare and aggressive gynecologic malignancy that has only been recognized in the last decade. It arises in the endometrium, ovaries, and other extrauterine sites (often in association with endometriosis) and closely mimics a variety of other tumor types that occur in these locations. While it shows significant morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular homology with cervical mesonephric adenocarcinoma, there are many clinicopathologic features that suggest müllerian derivation, and this is now well established. As research on MLA has accumulated, questions have emerged about optimal practices for the diagnosis of these challenging tumors. In 2022, faculty at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center convened the Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma (MLA) Consortium, comprised of international pathologists, gynecologic oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and basic science investigators with expertise in MLA, with the goals to enhance understanding of these tumors, refine diagnostic criteria, improve treatment options, and facilitate research collaborations. An initial review from the consortium was published in 2025, and included diagnostic recommendations from the group's pathologists. Controversies remain, however, about the morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular criteria that should be used to establish a diagnosis of MLA. Herein, the pathologists from the MLA Consortium provide a comprehensive evaluation of the literature on MLA diagnostic criteria, address ongoing controversies in this area, and provide practical guidance for pathologists considering this entity.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaGenital Neoplasms, FemaleFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryPathologistsendometrial cancerendometrial carcinomaextrauterine carcinomagynecologic cancergynecologic carcinomamesonephric carcinomamesonephric-like carcinomaMLAovarian cancerovarian carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41289365
PMCPMC12704686

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.