Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41289569›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Improving Work-Related Challenges in Psychiatric-Psychosomatic Clinics: Study Protocol for an Internet-Based Needs Assessment and Co-Design of a Training.

Katharina Schiffer, Sonia Lippke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katharina SchifferBremen International Graduate School of Social Sciences, Campus Ring 1, Bremen, 28759, Germany, 49 4212004730.ORCID 0009-0000-7985-4110
Sonia LippkeBremen International Graduate School of Social Sciences, Campus Ring 1, Bremen, 28759, Germany, 49 4212004730.ORCID 0000-0002-8272-0399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medical, psychiatric-psychosomatic facilities are confronted with a variety of daily challenges that affect working conditions, the mental health of employees, and the quality of patient care. This project focuses on the work-related challenges faced by health care professionals in psychiatric-psychosomatic clinics in Germany. Objective: The aim of the current research is to investigate the interactions between individuals and their social environment, identify psychological and organizational challenges and job demands, and use these findings to inform the development of a participatory, evidence-based intervention. Methods: This 2-phase research is grounded in the job demands-resources model (JD-R). Study phase (needs assessment) uses a cross-sectional online survey with health care professionals in German psychiatric-psychosomatic clinics to assess job demands, resources, and outcomes in a target sample of N=600 participants (power analysis). Study phase 2 (co-design of a training) involves co-creatively designing an intervention based on survey findings through participatory workshops with at least N=20 participants. Analyses include regression and moderation tests (SPSS; IBM Corporation) and qualitative data analysis to co-design training. Results: The recruitment of participants is planned to be finished by December 2025. The co-designing of workshops (phase 2) will be started in February 2026. As this is a study protocol, results are not available yet. Conclusions: This current research examines the work-related challenges faced by health care professionals in psychiatric-psychosomatic clinics. It is expected that burnout, engagement, and psychological safety will likely emerge as central mediating and moderating variables. As the findings of phase 1 serve as a basis for the development of an intervention, this research seeks to improve the well-being of health care professionals in psychiatric-psychosomatic institutions sustainably.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelNeeds AssessmentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansInternetMaleResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplacehealth care providersoccupational well-beingpatient safetyprevention & controlpsychology

Identifiers

PMID41289569
PMCPMC12646559

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.