Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41290204›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

Bayesian Prediction of Event Times Using Mixture Model for Blinded Randomized Controlled Trials.

Jingyan Fu, Dan Zhao, Donia Skanji, Hua Liu, Rui Sammi Tang, Ying Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jingyan FuDepartment of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Dan ZhaoGlobal Biometrics, Servier Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3761-7090
Donia SkanjiInstitut de Recherches Internationales Servier (IRIS), Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Hua LiuGlobal Biometrics, Servier Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Rui Sammi TangQuantitative Sciences and Evidence Generation, Astellas Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8524-771X
Ying YuanDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of key milestone dates, such as the timing of interim and final analyses, is crucial in event-driven clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints. These predictions facilitate timely decision-making, enhance strategic planning and optimize resource allocation while minimizing patient exposure to potentially ineffective or harmful therapies. Existing methods for predicting event timing in blinded randomized clinical trials (RCTs) typically assume identical time-to-event distributions for the treatment and control arms, implying no treatment effect. This assumption fails when the treatment is more effective than the control, which is often the very outcome the trial seeks to detect, leading to biased predictions. To address this issue, we propose a novel Bayesian Prediction of Event Times (BayesPET) method that allows for different time-to-event distributions between arms in blinded RCTs. We employ a mixture Weibull model for the observed interim event times, while addressing the critical challenge of label-switching in mixture models through truncated priors. Through extensive simulations and real-world applications to phase 3 clinical trials, we demonstrate the BayesPET produces superior predictive performance in both blinded and unblinded settings, supporting effective trial execution and accelerating the development of new therapies.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBayes TheoremClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicComputer SimulationHumansTime FactorsBayesian modelevent predictionlabel‐switchingmixture‐Weibull modeltime‐to‐event endpoints

Identifiers

PMID41290204
PMCPMC12646817

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.