ArticleStatistics in medicine2025
Bayesian Prediction of Event Times Using Mixture Model for Blinded Randomized Controlled Trials.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bayesian Prediction of Event Times Using Mixture Model for Blinded Randomized Controlled Trials.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of key milestone dates, such as the timing of interim and final analyses, is crucial in event-driven clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints. These predictions facilitate timely decision-making, enhance strategic planning and optimize resource allocation while minimizing patient exposure to potentially ineffective or harmful therapies. Existing methods for predicting event timing in blinded randomized clinical trials (RCTs) typically assume identical time-to-event distributions for the treatment and control arms, implying no treatment effect. This assumption fails when the treatment is more effective than the control, which is often the very outcome the trial seeks to detect, leading to biased predictions. To address this issue, we propose a novel Bayesian Prediction of Event Times (BayesPET) method that allows for different time-to-event distributions between arms in blinded RCTs. We employ a mixture Weibull model for the observed interim event times, while addressing the critical challenge of label-switching in mixture models through truncated priors. Through extensive simulations and real-world applications to phase 3 clinical trials, we demonstrate the BayesPET produces superior predictive performance in both blinded and unblinded settings, supporting effective trial execution and accelerating the development of new therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.