Trial reportAmerican journal of perinatology2026
Low Molecular Weight Heparin Thromboprophylaxis or No Treatment following Cesarean Delivery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in American journal of perinatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of randomizing patients to weight-based low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) versus no pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis following cesarean delivery (CD). Study Design: Single-center, open-label pilot randomized controlled trial of individuals aged 18+ undergoing CD at the University of Utah Health from November 2023 to June 2024. Those with a contraindication to anticoagulation, a plan for therapeutic anticoagulation, or considered at highest risk for postpartum venous thromboembolism (VTE; i.e., undergoing cesarean-hysterectomy, high-risk thrombophilia, personal history of thromboembolism) were excluded. Enrolled individuals were randomized in a 1:1 ratio utilizing block randomization with randomly varying block sizes to receive weight-based LMWH for 14 days or no pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. The primary outcome was feasibility, defined as ≥35% enrollment of eligible individuals and retention of ≥85% of enrolled individuals through all study procedures. Secondary feasibility outcomes included the number of eligible patients per month, approach rate, enrollment rate, and retention rate. Additional outcomes included VTE, wound hematoma, patient-reported symptoms, or a bleeding complication within 6 weeks postpartum. Baseline characteristics were compared between those approached and enrolled and those not enrolled. The proportion meeting each of the outcomes was reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Over the 6-month study period, 694 patients were screened and found eligible for an average of 106 eligible patients per month. There were 611 patients approached (88%, 95% CI: 85.6-90.5), of which 64 enrolled (10.5%, 95% CI: 8-12.9), and 61 participants were retained through all study procedures (95.3%, 95% CI: 90-100). Thus, the overall primary outcome feasibility parameters were not met. Among the 64 individuals enrolled and randomized, the mean age was 31.0 years (standard deviation: 5.5 years), and the majority were non-Hispanic White (56%). Baseline characteristics were similar between those who were approached and enrolled compared with those not enrolled. There were no differences in additional clinical outcomes (VTE, wound hematoma, patient-reported symptoms, or bleeding complications) by prophylaxis group. Conclusion: In this pilot trial, individual patient randomization to weight-based LMWH or no pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis after CD was not feasible due to low enrollment rates. Future trials addressing postpartum thromboembolism prevention should consider alternative study designs. Key Points: · Individual patient randomization to enoxaparin or no therapy after CD was not feasible.. · The approach rate, enrollment rate, and retention rate were 88, 11, and 95%, respectively, in this single-center pilot.. · Future prospective studies may need to consider alternative designs..
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.