ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative study of fetal facial shape between Japanese and North American populations using micro-CT.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population-level morphological differences in human cranio-skeletal morphology are reflective of a multitude of genetic, epigenetic, functional and environmental factors. While such differences have been described in postnatal and adult skeletons, how early they originate during cranio-skeletal ontogeny is unknown. Here we compare early human facial morphogenesis utilizing a collection of fetal specimens of Japanese (JP) and North American - European ancestry (NAP). Utilizing 3D micro-CT images and geometric morphometric analyses, we have identified subtle, yet significant differences in the morphology of the upper and midfacial regions in fetuses in the second trimester of gestation. Notably, the orbital rims and lateral areas of the zygomatic bones in the JP specimens have more prominent superior and inferior orbital rims, with a more prominent lateral project of the zygomatic bone, compared to the NAP. These data suggest that the cranioskeletal structures display early facial patterning unique to genealogically distinct populations. Since these specimens are derived from very early developmental stages, the impacts of functional factors are expected to be minor, while inherited genetic and epigenetic programming predominate in driving the observed morphological differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.