ArticleScientific reports2025
A comparative assessment of the antidepressant efficacy of ketamine, psilocybin, and fluoxetine in a chronic stress model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation of Potential Therapeutic Effects of New Rapid-Acting Antidepressant Drugs (RAADs) Using Stress-Based Models of Depression.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Psychoactive and Neurobiological Effects of Ketamine in Humans: A Scoping Review of Clinical Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Trials, trips, and tribulations: pathways for implementing psychedelic therapy in Ireland.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression is a debilitating mental disorder affecting millions worldwide, yet current pharmacological treatments, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), often exhibit delayed onset and limited efficacy. The chronic social defeat (CSD) stress model in mice is a well-established preclinical paradigm for inducing depression-like behaviors and evaluating antidepressants effectiveness. This study compared the efficacy of both acute and chronic fluoxetine with acute ketamine and psilocybin treatment in male C57BL/6J mice subjected to CSD. Fluoxetine showed no significant effects 24 h after a single dose or following 7 days of repeated administration; antidepressant-like effects only appeared after 14 days of continuous treatment. In contrast, a single dose of either ketamine or psilocybin significantly reversed social avoidance behavior at 24 h, with sustained effects observed at 7- and 14-days post-treatment. These findings suggest that ketamine and psilocybin elicit rapid and durable, antidepressant-like responses in this preclinical model, in contrast to traditional SSRIs, like fluoxetine, which requires extended treatment duration, mirroring clinical efficacy patterns. The results support the utility of the CSD model in evaluating antidepressant efficacy and highlight the therapeutic potential of fast-acting agents such as ketamine and psilocybin as alternatives to conventional treatments for major depressive disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.