Trial reportScientific reports2025
Strength training intervention for hybrid workers: a randomised pilot feasibility trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a major productivity and economic loss due to poor mental and physical health of the workforce. These factors can be improved by muscle strengthening exercise, which few people currently do. This study investigated the effect of a simple, time-efficient, resistance band training intervention on physical function and work-related outcomes in hybrid-working employees. In this pilot randomised controlled trial, untrained hybrid-working employees were randomised to a four-week resistance band training intervention (15 min 3x per week) or control group. Written and video instructions on the exercises were provided. The primary outcomes were physical function; 30s sit to stand and 30s push-up test, with secondary outcomes of perceived stress, work engagement and productivity. Outcome data was collected via an online survey. Fifty participants (age 46 ± 11 years; 41 female) were recruited to the study, with 46 completing the trial. Compared to the control group, the intervention group (adherence 89%) saw significant improvement in sit-to-stand (mean difference 5.34 ± 7.88 (SD), 95% CI [1.94, 8.75]; p = 0.04) and 30s push-up (mean difference 5.00 ± 3.37 (SD), 95% CI [3.54, 6.46]; p < 0.001) test score. Significant improvements were also found for perceived stress (p = 0.002), total work engagement (p = 0.008) and total productivity (p = 0.004). Four weeks of a simple, time-efficient resistance band training intervention improved lower and upper body physical function, stress, work engagement and productivity. This intervention may be a practical and simple strategy to improve adherence to muscle strengthening guidelines in hybrid working employees, whilst improving physical health and work-related outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.