ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Inferring the regulation dynamics of oscillatory networks from scRNA-seq data.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oscillatory processes such as the cell cycle play critical roles in cell fate determination and disease development. Yet, most current gene regulatory network (GRN) inference methods are based on gene-gene correlations or temporal progression, not adequately accounting for the recurrence in cyclic processes. We hypothesize that constraining the continuous ordering of relative positions along the cell cycle can enhance GRN inference accuracy of cell cycle regulation. To test performance, we evaluated eight representative methods and applied three of them to a mouse retinal progenitor single-cell gene expression dataset [1]. Incorporating cell cycle positions inferred by Tricycle [2] led to significant improvements compared against using experimental times, particularly for early progenitor cells that been hypothesized to be more intrinsically driven by cell cycle regulation. These findings highlight the promise of integrating oscillatory processes into causal inference frameworks to advance our understanding of gene regulation.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.