ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
The real-world safety profile of ranolazine: pharmacovigilance analysis of the FAERS database.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conventional Antiarrhythmics Class I-IV, Late INa Inhibitors, IKs Enhancers, RyR2 Stabilizers, Gap Junction Modulators, Atrial-Selective Antiarrhythmics, and Stable Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 as Useful Cytoprotective Therapy in Arrhythmias.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Long-term safety evaluation of mirtazapine: A real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ranolazine, a piperazine derivative, is used as a second-line treatment for individuals with stable or poorly managed chronic angina as well as for those whose chronic angina is not improving with other medications. However, there is still a lack of real-world evidence on the long-term safety of its adverse events (AEs), which calls for constant supplementation. Methods: This study conducted disproportionality analysis to evaluate the safety of ranolazine in clinical practice by utilizing data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Reporting Odds Ratio, Proportional Reporting Ratio, Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network were used to identify signals of possible adverse events linked to ranolazine. Additionally, the Weibull distribution was implemented to simulate how the frequency of adverse events changed over time. Results: Positive signals were found for adverse events listed on the medication label, including dizziness, nausea, asthenia, constipation, headache, palpitations, tinnitus, abdominal pain, dry mouth, vomiting, peripheral edema, dyspnea and hypotension. Additionally, potential side effects not included on the label were also identified, including chest pain, cardiac disorder, electrocardiogram qt prolonged, hypertension, seizure, tremor, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, pulmonary embolism, myoclonus and myocardial infarction. The significance of tracking adverse events was underlined, especially during the first month after the start of treatment. Conclusion: Our study has confirmed certain known adverse effects and identified other potential hazards by providing preliminary safety data on the practical use of ranolazine. The results present vital safety information for physicians prescribing ranolazine. Notably, this study only identifies safety signals and does not establish causal relationships between ranolazine and the observed adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.